Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.
About The Department - Vision and Beyond



Over the last half century or so, a vast body of knowledge(s) on the region has evolved within South Asia that mostly remain within the countries of their origin due to a number of reasons. In this specific context, there is a crucial need to share some of this knowledge in contemporary times when, despite assertions of localisations and mini-narratives, the universal does retain its emphasis through a constant dialectics of the two. The debate between the local and universal or mini-narratives and meta-narratives continue to rage, and is more clearly visible in the context of South Asian context. Even so, we are acutely aware of the non-existence of regular and serious forums for South Asian scholarship in social sciences to showcase our own research and thinking. We are also quite conscious of the fact that the process of establishing sociology in the region has created its own peculiarities which has established close inter-relationships between sociology and social anthropology, history, cultural studies, archeology and other related disciplines. We consider the porousness of South Asian sociology one of its most enduring strengths. On the other hand, we are not unaware of the unfortunate regressions sociology has experienced in different South Asian contexts over the last 30 years or so marked by numerous institutional failures.



It is within the context(s) outlined above that the Department of Sociology at South Asian university, initiated in 2011 witihn the Faculty of Social Sciences contributes to teaching, training and knowledge production. It is not intended to be a mere forum for the production of cutting-edge intellectual knowledge and exchange of that knowledge traversing across national borders in South Asia and beyond. Our expectation is that this knowledge would dislocate the persistence of an imposed framework emanating from the colonisation process and postcolonial politics of knowledge. Despite the passage of over fifty years since the process of official decolonization began in the region, much of the analyses of our problems, situations, histories and dynamics emanate from Euro American academia; this is certainly the case when it comes to conceptual formulations and theoretical approaches that are being employed in exploring the region’s social and cultural complexities often without much self-reflection.



The Department of Sociology strongly believes in the need to reformulate this situation by effectively centering South Asia without naively shunning thought from these established centers of knowledge be they in Europe or North America. We believe in an active and robust engagement with these issues within South Asia. In this context, through the work of its faculty and the research of graduate students, the Department would bring forward the newer forms of knowledge that comprehends and represents the South Asian context with a more authoritative and nuanced voice. We strongly believe in the need to actively intervene in the process of knowledge formation through a constant sharing of knowledge that the region produces as well as through interaction with the world beyond the region.



The courses taught in the Department as well as the research carried out by its faculty members reflect this overall vision and our collective commitment towards innovation, move beyond untenable stereotypes, and explore a new world of knowledge within the discipline of Sociology.


Class of 2011, Department of Sociology, South Asian University; Image: Courtesy of Dev N. Pathak, Sociology, SAU.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

‘Conditions of Knowing’: An Interdisciplinary Workshop on Theory and Methodology


Workshop

As an initiative of the Faculty of Social Sciences, an interdisciplinary workshop on the matter of ‘theory and methodology in the social sciences’ has been planned for the  24 , 28 and 31 October 2013 from 4.30 pm to 6.30 pm at the Mezzanine Floor and FSI Hall of South Asian University. While research students undergo courses in theory and methodology, how do they relate these two programmes together? What are the challenges in bridging the seeming gap between theory and methodology? How do students and the faculty who conduct classes on these two topics really understand theory and methodology? Can a conversation on these two crucial themes be initiated between proponents of different social science disciplines?

The workshop is aimed at PhD students and academic colleagues in the Faculty of Social Sciences. We hope that this workshop will initiate conversations between departments in the Faculty of Social Sciences and foster a climate of interdisciplinary engagement among colleagues and students. Followup events planned fr 2014 and beyond will be open to wider academic participation. 

Preamble

The pursuit of scholarship involves a number of interests ranging from the pragmatic, to the normative or positivist state of things to the political. The existence of numerous disciplines which fall under the broad rubric of the social sciences contributes to this complexity. Often, the structure of social science disciplines as they are taught is extremely dependant on the composition and approach of a concerned department. For example, the University of Chicago houses Departments of Sociology, Anthropology and Economics which stand out for promoting particular agendas, hence giving rise to schools of thought in those fields. Perhaps one of the greatest sources of complexity and strength in social science scholarship is the diversity of approaches, areas of interest and styles of teaching and pedagogy across departments. 

At the core of every social science discipline, especially as they are broken down into teachable components for students, there appear to be two universals: theory and methodology. The question of theory is often regarded to be central to any discipline. Methodology is considered critical to the pursuit and the craft of knowledge. Yet, these two components of scholarship are subject to continuous debate. Students and faculty members in the social sciences are often faced with a situation whereby theory and/or methodology are fetishized, leading to an unproductive divide between what is imagined to be theoretical and the empirical.

The social sciences are marked by the diversity of ways of doing research. Sociological research alone often includes scholarship facilitated by quantitative research methods, ethnography, case studies and archival research among others. Scholarship in International Relations demonstrates diversity of both methods and of theoretical approaches from related disciplines of Political Science, History and Political Economy.  However, methodology may often be misunderstood for a fetishization of methods.

On the whole, regardless of the disciplinary perspective and approaches we may employ, a conversation across disciplines on matters of theory and methodology is crucial as it shapes the conditions of knowing.

Format

The format of the workshop will consist of three panels to be conducted over three days after teaching hours: The first two panels will deal with concerns of methodology and theory for the two constituent departments of the Faculty of Social Sciences: Sociology and International Relations.  Each of these sessions will feature short presentations of notes shared by faculty members on theory and methodology. The faculty members will then be followed by presentations made by the PhD students of each department. Each presentation will last 10-15 minutes. The end of each panel will be followed by a session for questions from the audience addressed to panellists.

The third panel will consist of a roundtable session bringing together all faculty members from the two departments of the Faculty of Social Sciences.

Panel I-Sociology

Date: 24.10.13 Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Venue: FSI Hall
Chair: Dr. Dev Pathak

Name
Topic
Time
Ankur Datta
Notes on Theory
10 min
Chudamani Basnet
Notes on Methodology
10 min
Krishna Pandey
Student Intervention
15 min
Kumud Bhansal
Student Intervention
15 min
Question and Answer Session

20 Minutes


Panel II- International Relations

Date: 28.10.2013 Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Venue: FSI Hall
Chair: Prof. Rajen Harshe

Name
Topic
Time
Siddharth Mallavarapu
Notes on Theory
10 min
Jayashree Vivekanandan
Notes on Methodology
10 min
Vaishali Raghuvanshi
Student Intervention
15 min
Omar Sadr
Student Intervention
15 min
Anu Krishna SS
Student Intervention
15 Min
Question and Answer Session

20 Minutes


Panel-III- Round Table-Involving faculty members from the departments of International Relations and Sociology

Date: 31.10.2013
Time: 4.30pm-6pm
Venue: Mezzanine Floor
Chair: Prof. S. Perera, Dean FSS
Agenda for the Round Table


Is there a gap between theory and methodology in the Social Sciences? If so, can this gap be bridged?

What can students and practitioners in the disciplines of Sociology and International Relations learn from each other?

What do we understand by the ‘conditions of knowing’?

Workshop and Series Coordinators

Ankur Datta, Department of Sociology.
Siddharth Mallavarapu, Department of International Relations.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Conference: Educational Transformation and Transformative Education: Possibilities and Alternatives to the Educational Crisis

Cartoon on Sri Lankan education by Awantha Atigala  

Call for Papers 
Department of Sociology, South Asian University in association with Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung will organise an international conference in March 2014 on the theme, Educational Transformation and Transformative Education: Possibilities and Alternatives to the Educational Crisis. The conference would look at the possibilities and alternatives to the crisis generated in the field of education by impact of neoliberalism. Some of the tentative themes to be debated during the conference would include the following:

1. Imagining a transformative education:

a. Resistance as the beginning of transformation; the  distinct forms of resisting neoliberalism in education.
b. Alternative as the beginning of resistance; embryonic alternative visions within crisis and the resistances
c. Existing educational alternatives in South Asia and their transformative potential to neoliberal orientations

2. The changes in South Asian education as neoliberalism arrives and the nature of responses to the changes

3. Contribution of critical pedagogy towards imagining an alternative

a. Can education autonomously effect socio-political transformation?
b. Consequences of locating education within the larger socio-economic and political matrix
c. Teacher as an agent of transformation
d. Conceptualising extensions of pedagogy beyond the classroom
e. Establishing the necessity to connect socio-economic and political realities with pedagogy

4. Social movements as pedagogical possibilities

Last date of submission of abstracts (500 words): 30th November, 2013
Submission of selected papers: 1st March 2014

For details, please visist:
http://critiquesouthasia.wordpress.com/2013/10/09/educational-transformation-and-transformative-education-possibilities-and-alternatives-to-the-educational-crisis/

For any other enquiry contact:
educonference2014@gmail.com